Shareholder oppression claims and start-up investment – ‘Get your Ducks in a Row’

The case of BBHF Pty Ltd v Sleeping Duck Pty Ltd [2024] provides useful guidance regarding shareholder oppression claims in the context of investment in start-ups.  The decision highlights the need for clear, written shareholder agreements and the objective test applied when assessing whether oppressive conduct has occurred. 

Read More

Federal Court stresses the Importance of Trust Deed Interpretation

A recent decision handed down by the Full Federal Court in Advanced Holdings Pty Limited as Trustee for the Demian Trust v FCT [2021] FCAFC 135 emphasises the important principles of trust deed interpretation and the limitations of statutory provisions concerning the evidentiary force of company records. The decision also serves as a valuable reminder for directors of small companies and corporate trustees to maintain good records.

Read More

ASIC commences landmark proceedings against RI Advice Group Pty Ltd for inadequate cyber security

Following multiple cyber-attacks to financial service adviser RI Advice Group Pty Ltd (RI), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission commenced proceedings against RI alleging contravention of its obligations under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) for failure to have adequate cyber security systems as an Australian Financial Services licence holder.

Read More

COVID-19 Company Admin Update

Further to our article here where we wrote about the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) guidance regarding annual general meetings and the COVID-19 pandemic, the Treasurer has released the Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No 1) 2020 (Cth) (Determination), which commences on 6 May 2020 and will be automatically repealed on 5 September 2020.

Read More

ASIC v King – Are you an “officer” of a company?

In this case, the High Court reiterated that a person can be deemed to be an “officer” of a company even if that person does not hold a position as a named ‘Director’ or ‘Secretary’.

Read More

Clarity on financial assistance. The High Court rules in Connective Services v Slea

In a unanimous judgement, the High Court recently held that Connective Services Pty Ltd had breached its obligations under the Corporations Act (Act) by bringing and funding litigation in respect of the enforcement of its shareholders’ constitutional pre-emption rights against an outgoing shareholder.

Read More