GREAT, ALL DONE
Thanks, that’s all we need. We’ll get this reviewed by one of our lawyers and sent out to you within the next business day.
In the meantime, you can explore our business articles below or return to our digital business services.
And remember that we grow by word of mouth, so if you think this is a great service, let people know about it.
If your organisation is a registered charity with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC), you are required to notify the ACNC of the appointment of people responsible for governing the charity. These are known as “Responsible Persons”. Essentially, they are entrusted with making decisions on behalf of the charity and determining how the organisation should be run.
We are honoured to announce that our esteemed consultant, Rob Jeremiah, will retire from active practice at Harwood Andrews, effective 5 December 2025
As covered in our previous article series (link), amendments to the Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth), extending anti money laundering (AML) and counter terror financing (CTF) obligations to additional professional service sectors, will take effect from the 1 July 2026.
At the heart of law firms’ anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) obligations is a risk assessment.
With the passing of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Act 2024 (Cth) (Act), law firms will soon be subject to the expanded anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) regime.
Reporting and recordkeeping are core pillars of the anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) regime.
Harwood Andrews is delighted to have been identified by clients and peers for expertise and abilities for Victoria in the 2026 Doyle’s Guide. Doyle's Guide is a highly regarded independent annual peer review of the leading corporate law firms and lawyers in Victoria.
With the passing of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Act 2024 (Cth) (Act), law firms will soon be subject to the expanded anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) regime. The Act captures firms of all sizes, from sole practitioners handling conveyancing to large commercial practices with trust accounts, with core obligations for law firms and conveyancers commencing on 1 July 2026.
New Division 296 Tax – A win for the industry
Controversial taxation bill has been watered down – tax of unrealised gains has been scrapped.
Harwood Andrews congratulates Daniel Fullerton, Principal Lawyer in our Disputes team, on his recognition as a Law Institute of Victoria (LIV) Accredited Specialist in Commercial Litigation Law.
This prestigious accreditation reflects Daniel’s expertise and experience in commercial litigation and adds to our team of LIV-accredited specialists, reinforcing our commitment to excellence for our clients.
In the case of Roberts ([2025] FCA 957) an application to the Federal Court to exercise its discretion to grant leave to a bankrupt individual to manage a self-managed superfund.
Landholder duty issues for Hybrid Unit Trusts highlighted by Victory International Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2025] VSC 484
From 1 October 2025, changes to the Home Guarantee scheme will come into effect for Australians looking to purchase their first home. The scheme will allow all first home owners eligible under the scheme to purchase a property with a 5% deposit with no income eligibility requirements and increased price caps on the value of property.
Criminals have long used real estate as a way of laundering or concealing funds – not only can they get that trophy house, a real estate purchase allows a large amount of money to be laundered in a single transaction.
One of the biggest shifts for law firms under Tranche 2 of the anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) regime will be undertaking customer due diligence (CDD) before acting.
Every law firm that provides a “designated service” must establish and maintain an anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) program. Think of it as the rulebook your firm writes for itself, setting out how your firm identifies, assesses and manages AML/CTF risk.
It is important for law firms to obtain clarity on what services are captured by the anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) regime.
For years, Australian law firms have heard rumblings about anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) rules extending to the legal profession. With the passing of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Act 2024 (Cth) (Act), those rules are finally here.
Every practice providing designated services must develop an AML/CTF program. Think of it as your playbook for managing money-laundering risk.
The AML/CTF regime uses a ‘designated services’ model for regulation. This means that regardless of branding or occupation, if a business provides one or more Designated Services as set out in the Act, they are regulated under the regime.
Internationally, the professions - accountants and lawyers, have been consistently characterised as “gatekeepers” and “professional enablers” of crime and corruption – remember the Panama Papers?
With the passage of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Act 2024 to providers of certain professional services, these ‘Tranche 2” entities – including many accounting practices – will become regulated by Australia’s Anti-Money Laundering regime from 1 July 2026.
Harwood Andrews is delighted to have been identified by clients and peers for expertise and abilities for Victoria in the 2025 Doyles Guide.
Harwood Andrews is delighted to have been identified by clients and peers for expertise and abilities for Victoria in the 2025 Doyles Guide.
Appropriately considering the successive control of discretionary trusts, at both a trustee and an appointor level, is a critical component in succession planning. The recent Queensland Court of Appeal decision of Staley v Hill Family Holdings Pty Ltd highlighted this, after broad variation powers resulted in the removal of an appointor by a trustee which could have been avoided had the succession of the trust been properly addressed.
After a relationship breakdown, one of the most pressing concerns for a separated person is often how they are going to be able to financially support themselves going forward. This is particularly so if it is now down to them alone to meet their bills and living expenses which were previously shared with or paid by their former partner.
A review has been conducted of the Retirement Villages Act 1986 (Vic) (Retirement Villages Act) based on community feedback that the current legislation does not provide adequate protection for retirement village residents. The new laws offer greater safeguards and regulation of many aspects of retirement villages and residence contracts for retirement villages. The changes are extensive, however we have detailed below some of the significant changes.
The Victorian Supreme Court’s decision in Beecham Motors Pty Ltd v General Motors Holden Australia [2025] VSC 125 highlights the importance of precise contractual drafting. Beecham Motors, a Holden dealership, sued GM Holden after General Motors announced the Holden brand’s exit from Australia, disrupting their contract.
This recent decision emphasises the need for clear, precise contract terms rather relying on good faith to give effect to uncertain terms.
Foreign purchasers living within Australia must be aware of important requirements to fulfill a section 69AJ exemption under the Duties Act 2000 (Vic). The case of Sim v Commissioner of State Revenue [2025] VCAT 349 highlights how all requirements of section 69AJ must be met to receive an exemption to the foreign purchaser additional duty.
The Victorian Government has introduced a new 50% penalty tax for cases of recklessness under state tax laws, as part of the 2025–26 State Budget measures. This penalty applies where a taxpayer or their advisor is found to have acted recklessly, causing a tax shortfall or failing to meet notification requirements.
Previously, penalties ranged from 25% (negligence) to 75% (intentional disregard). There are concerns that this new penalty could be unfairly applied in complex cases, especially involving trusts or foreign interests, where rules are often misunderstood.
Make sure you follow us to stay up to date