The recent Supreme Court decision of Sec New Line Pty Ltd & Anor v Muffin Break Pty Ltd has provided interesting insight into franchisor obligations, specifically whether there is a requirement to inform franchisees of important facts relating to their lease agreements.

The decision focused on two main questions – whether a franchisor is required to inform a franchisee about important changes to their lease agreement, and does reinstating a property’s condition require de-fitting?

The case of Connelly (liquidator) v Papadopoulos, in the matter of TSK QLD Pty Ltd (in liq) (TSK) [2024] FCA 888 provides important insights into the serious implications for directors and officers of companies and professional advisers involved in the restructuring of companies when later found to be asset-stripping schemes. When restructuring, companies must conduct thorough due diligence and plan for a smooth transition to mitigate operational risks.

While some industry voices call for a deferral, with Labor’s recent election win and more favourable senate, commentators have raised that it could be likely that the proposed Division 296 tax will commence on 1 July 2025.

Affected individuals should evaluate whether to act now or wait, depending on personal circumstances. Options include withdrawing super before or after the start date or doing nothing if modelling shows better long-term outcomes. Each option should be carefully considered based on individual’s financial situations.

Please don’t circulate to the firm to share with their networks via LinkedIn as LH dislikes this for family law articles*

No specific hashtags or mentions required. Happy for you to generate a brief summary.

Family law matters have historically been matters relating to divorce, parenting arrangements, property settlements and the like.  But what about our furry friends?   Once a couple separates, how does the Court decide who is to retain the family pet.

The article contains good information and starting points, and examines some of the options available to parents to consider.

The New South Wales Supreme Court decision in Re Absolute Vision Technologies Pty Ltd (subject to deed of company administration) [2024] NSWSC 1010 provides judicial guidance in relation to whether a former corporate trustee, despite being in voluntary administration, could complete a sale contract for SMSF property and distribute the proceeds to the new trustee.

In the case of Dryandra Investments Pty Ltd v Hardie by her guardian ad litem Ian Torrington Blatchford [2024] WASC 24, the Supreme Court of Western Australia examined a key aspect of estate planning and structuring: ensuring proper succession for the roles of appointor and guardian. The decision underscores the risks that arise when these crucial roles are overlooked, and succession is not addressed by an appointor or guardian before they lose capacity or pass away.

Harwood Andrews is pleased to announce that 11 lawyers have been included in the 2026 edition of The Best Lawyers in Australia™. Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence.

The New South Wales Supreme Court has reconvened for a second time, this time addressing the implications of a lost trust deed.  This decision highlights the crucial responsibility of trustees to properly preserve trust deed documents, not only to maintain the trust’s validity but also to prevent adverse outcomes, such as taxation or duties.