Employment Law and OH&S Harwood Andrews Employment Law and OH&S Harwood Andrews

Fair Work Commissioner warns against “first and final” warnings

In a decision of the FWC handed down this week, Fair Work Commissioner Bissett decided that an employee who had been dismissed for a breach of his employer’s zero tolerance drug and alcohol policy was unfairly dismissed, because of reliance placed by the employer on an previous “first and final” warning which was found not to be warranted.

Read More
Employment Law and OH&S Harwood Andrews Employment Law and OH&S Harwood Andrews

IR system needs tweaking not trashing; draft report of Productivity Commission

Today, the Productivity Commission released a draft report on its once in a generation review of the Australian workplace relations framework (see related article - Productivity Commission to Conduct Generational Review of Industrial Relations Laws).

The draft report outlines the key issues identified so far during the inquiry, discusses some of the draft recommendations and findings of the Productivity Commission, and invites feedback and comment from stakeholders on a variety of issues.

Read More
Employment Law and OH&S Harwood Andrews Employment Law and OH&S Harwood Andrews

An employer’s failure to make reasonable adjustments results in big payout

In a recent case in the Federal Circuit Court an employer; Corrective Services New South Wales, was ordered to pay a former probation and parole officer employed by it the sum of $180,000 plus interest as a result of discriminatory treatment of her.  The employee suffered from Crohn’s Disease and took sick leave on a number of occasions.

Read More
Employment Law and OH&S Harwood Andrews Employment Law and OH&S Harwood Andrews

Adverse action pinned down by the high court

The High Court of Australia has handed down its second significant decision on the interpretation of the adverse action provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).  Readers will recall the High Court’s 2012 decision in the Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay which provided employers with guidance on what must be established to defend a claim that adverse action had been taken against an employee for a prohibited reason.  

Read More