Planning & Environment Aaron Shrimpton Planning & Environment Aaron Shrimpton

The New Victorian Environment Protection Framework

On 1 July 2021, the Environment Protection Act 2017 (New Act) came into effect.

The new environment protection framework adopts a preventative, risk-based approach to preventing harm to human health and the environment. This is a shift away from the Former Act which adopted a prohibitive, reactionary approach whereby polluters were punished after committing an offence.

Read More
About Us, Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews About Us, Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews

Harwood Andrews Planning & Environment ranked in Doyles Guide, Victoria 2021 across four categories

Harwood Andrews is delighted to have been identified by clients and peers for expertise and abilities in two areas for Victoria in the 2021 Doyles Guide. Doyle's Guide is a highly regarded independent annual peer review of the leading corporate law firms and lawyers in Victoria.

Read More
Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews

Can a planning authority change its mind?

The answer, according to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal in Canaan Holdings Pty Ltd v Whitehorse CC [2015] VCAT 1608, is ‘no’.

In February 2015, Whitehorse City Council decided to adopt Amendment C153 to the Whitehorse Planning Scheme (Amendment), which formed part of a combined application under s 96A of the Planning and Environment Act (Act).  Approximately a month late, in March, the Council purported to rescind its decision and to abandon the Amendment.

Read More
Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews

Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal confirms it has jurisdiction to review section 173 agreements

In the recent decision of Calderara v Banyule (Calderara) the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) considered whether section 149(1)(b) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 conferred it jurisdiction to review a Council’s decision not to ‘agree’ to an action restricted under a section 173 agreement.

Read More
Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews

Victorian Court of Appeal clarifies scope of considerations relevant to determining planning permit applications for demolition of heritage buildings

In a unanimous decision, the Court of Appeal (Warren CJ, Santamaria JA and Garde AJA) upheld the decision of VCAT to grant a planning permit for the demolition and redevelopment of ‘Arden’, a significant heritage place under the Boroondara Planning Scheme (Boroondara City Council v 1045 Burke Road Pty Ltd [2015] VSCA 27). 

Read More
Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews Planning & Environment Harwood Andrews

Expert duty to notify material change of opinion at VCAT

Members in the Planning and Environment List have been increasingly reluctant to allow expert witnesses to introduce changes to a development proposal through expert evidence. Parties are expected to seek expert advice early and incorporate any expert recommendations through the amended plans process enabling due notice to be provided to other parties and the Tribunal of a proposed change.

Read More

Land Acquisition: Awards of Costs to Claimants Despite Determination in Favour of Acquiring Authority

The Tribunal in Heislers v Melbourne Water Corporation [2014] VCAT 1399 ordered that Melbourne Water, as the acquiring authority of a pipeline easement related to the Wonthaggi desalination plant, pay 80% of the claimant’s costs in the proceeding. 

Read More