Recognising objectors – early guidance on demonstrating a significant social effect
In the lead up to the 2014 State election, the (then) Labor opposition promised to introduce legislation concerning the weight to be given to the number of objections received in respect of a planning permit application.
Owners Corporation rules cannot stop office to apartment conversions
A recent decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal has confirmed further restrictions on the ability of Owners Corporation rules to regulate the use of lots. This decision follows an earlier ruling that Owners Corporations are unable to stop short term leasing of apartments.
Common Owners Corporation rule declared invalid
A recent VCAT decision has clarified the powers of Owners Corporations to regulate short term leasing. It is common for Owners Corporation Rules to restrict certain activities that can be done in a multi-unit complex.
Tribunal clarifies role of experts in planning jurisdiction
The Tribunal recently commented upon the role that expert witnesses play in proceedings before the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
Forum Hotel and Forum Theatre – can two projects be one?
The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) has last week considered the operation of Clause 61.01 which makes the Minister for Planning the responsible authority for certain planning applications within the City of Melbourne.
Supreme Court clarifies obligation to consider social and economic effects of planning scheme amendments
Dustday Investments v Minister for Planning & Melbourne City Council [Dustday] represents the first judicial consideration of the current section 12(2) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal confirms it has jurisdiction to review section 173 agreements
In the recent decision of Calderara v Banyule (Calderara) the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) considered whether section 149(1)(b) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 conferred it jurisdiction to review a Council’s decision not to ‘agree’ to an action restricted under a section 173 agreement.