Legal Insights
Broad Powers, Unintended Consequences: Trustee's Authority to Remove Appointor Upheld
Appropriately considering the successive control of discretionary trusts, at both a trustee and an appointor level, is a critical component in succession planning. The recent Queensland Court of Appeal decision of Staley v Hill Family Holdings Pty Ltd highlighted this, after broad variation powers resulted in the removal of an appointor by a trustee which could have been avoided had the succession of the trust been properly addressed.
The Courts supervisory powers: ensuring the proper administration and due execution of trusts
In the case of Dryandra Investments Pty Ltd v Hardie by her guardian ad litem Ian Torrington Blatchford [2024] WASC 24, the Supreme Court of Western Australia examined a key aspect of estate planning and structuring: ensuring proper succession for the roles of appointor and guardian. The decision underscores the risks that arise when these crucial roles are overlooked, and succession is not addressed by an appointor or guardian before they lose capacity or pass away.